|
Learn the difference between |
Norton Internet Security 2004 - Ad Blocker Issues
|
||
| Jim
Edwards here with an interesting editorial that has me pretty steamed
up!
(It's an editorial rather than an article because I'm mad!) Did you realize that certain programs like Norton Internet Security actually modify the web pages you see before you see them? That's right! They literally *censor* the pages by removing certain links, banners... even some flash content. But what's got me so mad is they do it without really telling people it's going to happen! What do I mean? You need to read this editorial below and it explains the problem. If you sell (or plan to sell) anything as an affiliate or have affiliates sell for you... you must read this article. To your success, Jim Edwards
PS
- If you'd like to see a live demonstration of what I'm It will blow your mind! => http://www.IGottaTellYou.com/-issue21.html -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- |
||
Is Norton Internet Security Blocking Legitimate Links?
©
Jim Edwards - All Rights reserved I'm the first one to admit we need to curb the unbridled spam, pop-up windows, banner ads and overall aggressive advertising currently going unchecked online. Like everyone, I find it extremely frustrating to land on a website only to get bombarded with distractions that make it extremely difficult to determine if the website contains what I need. However, the solution offered by Norton Internet Security 2004 may represent a bigger problem than it solves. Ad blockers and pop-up blockers, like the one built into Norton Internet Security 2004 (NIS 2004), are designed to block advertising. "Ads" appear defined as banners, pop-ups, and links with a commercial intent. When turned on, these blockers literally modify web pages you visit which contain code meeting certain criteria. In other words, they chop out parts of the html pages before you ever even get a chance to see them in your web browser - and that's where things get sticky. You see, NIS 2004 comes preloaded to decide what is and what is not advertising, even to the point where they block entire domains, such as qksrv.net, one of the largest affiliate networks in the world (also known as Commission Junction). It also blocks Google Ad Sense content on individual websites. In
fact, any link containing one of hundreds of other variables defined
by NIS 2004 will invoke automatic Now you may ask why this matters. Isn't it a good thing to block advertising? Well, I must insist the answer is "no" for several reasons: First, on my copy of NIS 2004 ad blocking came in the default "on" position. That means users will experience content blocking without their express consent. Someone else determines what is and what is not classified as advertising. Ever searched online for hours trying to find a particular product, gift, service, or solution to a problem? Now imagine that you'll never find it because anywhere you might see a link for it automatically gets deleted from every web page before you view it. Second, on a personal level, do you really want someone else deciding if a link, banner, flash object or other piece of content is appropriate for you to view or not? (I'm not talking about p~rn~graphy or socially unacceptable material - that's a different debate.) What's next after "ads?" Will "ad blocker" software turn into "content blocker" software and start censoring various articles, web pages, and even entire domains because they contain certain words someone else labeled inappropriate? Do you want someone else thinking for you? Third, if you operate a responsible, customer-oriented, focused website built around a central theme, how do you feel about a third-party software blocking some or all of your money-making content... especially after you've worked so hard to attract targeted visitors to your site? Now, I'm not saying ad blockers are wrong. I'll also state for the record that I LOVE Norton's products and have used them for years. If someone wants to block advertising when they surf, that's their right. However, where I see a real problem is with the scope of the blocking and the fact that, at least on my copy of NIS 2004, ad blocking came in the default "on" position. This creates circumstances where it's likely the user doesn't know how content is getting modified before they see it, and it sets a very bad precedent for things to come.
[ Weekly eBiz News | Article Archives | Business Articles | Marketing Articles ]
|
