Work At Home Mom, Nailed.

[random]

Work At Home Mom Just Got Nailed For Promoting ****!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/cmp/20060310/tc_cmp/181502371

Why people get involved with crap like that beats me.

[Lynn Terry]

And she's not even a MOM

That was a shocking article - LOL - thanks for sharing the link!

[alice]

Seems Kelly McCausey is in a lot of hot water mentioning this one:
http://www.wahmtalkradio.com/blog/2006/ ... -in-a-lie/

What out Ms. Lynny...they could be coming for you next.

Personally, I really don't have a comment about Jennifer, but I do have a general comment about her defenders. It's amazing to me that these mothers/women can throw out any personal attack they would like at Kelly (and at myself for exposing the potentially illegal auto-surf programs they happen to participate in - they have been personally attacking us and making threats for weeks on a few forums), but when Kelly makes an observation and states an opinion, she is the evil one.

Alice

[Carrielee]

That's because people HATE to be shown up for what they truly are. Hands caught in the cookie jar...

And I love the "judging" excuse... people who have no morals always say that. It is the ONE scripture they know. And they're still wrong about it.
It's not wrong to judge. It's wrong to condemn a person, but not their actions. Otherwise why do we have a judicial system and police to enforce the law?

Some people just have too much time on their hands.

Carrie Lauth

[sugarrae]

Ok, I'm gonna chime in...

>>>Work At Home Mom Just Got Nailed For Promoting ****!

That is *NOT* what she got "nailed" for. Last I checked, **** was legal. She got nailed for sending out email spam which is not. Replace **** with pills, rolexes, hair loss - she got nailed for email spam. It amazes me that more people are talking about her promoting **** then breaking the dang law. Who cares *what* she spammed. She's an email spammer. That's why she is in trouble. WHAT she spammed has no relevance at all.

[Sandra]

Rae, that is a good point. It was the spamming that was against the law. But she was the one who said she regretting doing the **** sites.

The WAHM thing does seem to be a credibility issue. Not just her personally, but if I can see how my trust would be a bit shaken if a similar issue happened with a person or company I did business with.

The comments on Kelly's blog are absolutely shocking - so mean and nasty. I think that a blogger has the right to turn off comments / delete once it gets to such a level.

[Lynn Terry]

Great point, Rae - and I agree, Sandra... the comments there were truly shocking!

Seems Kelly McCausey is in a lot of hot water mentioning this one:
http://www.wahmtalkradio.com/blog/2006/ ... -in-a-lie/

What out Ms. Lynny...they could be coming for you next.

Thanks for the link, Alice. I was floored!

Here's the link to my own blog post on the topic:
http://www.clicknewz.com/10/work-at-hom ... -spamming/

I actually felt that Kelly's blog post was plenty tasteful. I didnt hear the audio or the show, but the text read well IMO. Interesting how the "Clason Groupies" tore it to shreds, though!

Geez